home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
pc
/
illusion
/
rock_fie.cxt
/
00331_Field_331.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-12-31
|
2KB
|
65 lines
Impressive support for the
depth-processing theory comes
from another variation of the
Poggendorff figure. If the
inducing pattern of lines is
modified to look like a
rectangle at a slant so that the
plane of the surface formed by
the vertical lines appears to
slant back, the illusion is
much diminished or disappears.
In the actual three-
dimensional scene that such a
figure represents, the oblique
lines would belong to the same
plane. Yet other theories, such
as the theory of angular
displacement, would predict
the persistence of an illusion
in this example because the
angles formed by the vertical
and oblique lines remain
unchanged.
The depth-processing theory
may also explain why, in the
illustration seen earlier, in
which the acute and the obtuse
angle components of the
overall illusion pattern are
separated from one another,
the illusion occurs in the case
of the obtuse angles and not in
the case of the acute angles.
Both versions could represent a
scene in perspective. In the
figure with obtuse angles,
however, the two oblique lines
appear to represent horizontal
lines at very different heights.
But in the figure with acute
angles, the two oblique lines
appear to represent horizontal
lines at roughly the same
height. For this reason, the
theory predicts--correctly--an
illusion of misalignment in the
first case but not in the second.
Finally, the depth-processing
theory accounts for the
misalignment illusion obtained
with the illusory contour
figure. Physical contours
adjacent to the oblique
components are not necessary
because angular misperception
is not based on a process such
as lateral inhibition. All that is
required for the illusion to
occur is that the given
perceived components trigger a
perspective interpretation.